In the picture above,
we see an image from the “Simpsons” and the description reads “The ones with
eyelashes are girls; boys don’t have eyelashes”. A four-year-old already has a
sense of gender or should I say sex, and this is how she illustrates or
represents it in a drawing. It is interesting to see how gender is defined
in the movies that we watch from birth, and I think that’s where our
sense of gender is from. Every little girl believes they are a princess and
every little boy the prince charming. I also find it intriguing
how women are being referred to in many eras in time, from the “other sex”,
“opposite sex”, etc. The most surprising to me is the seventeenth-century
European view that men and women were better and worse versions of the same
sex. “Women are but men turned outside-in”. It is surprising to think that
these were the same group of people fighting for distinction in society and
stopped wearing heels because women and “common” people started wearing them. Even though gender distinction is good in some
ways for society, it is also important to note that there are a lot of
similarities between men and women and we’re not so opposite.
Fausto Sterling says that we should have five sexes, instead of two. she brings in the idea of intersex people being left out of the equation. Society has a box of males and females and intersex people must fit in even though they face a totally different situation. In her piece titled “The Five
Sexes”, she says “In its place, I suggested a five-sex system. In addition to
males and females, I included “herms” (named after true hermaphrodites, people
born with both a testis and an ovary); “merms” (male pseudohermaphrodites, who
are born with testes and some aspect of female genitalia); and “ferms” (female
pseudohermaphrodites, who have ovaries combined with some aspect of male
genitalia).
The idea of having five sexes can be a bit
far-fetched but is it unattainable? I ask this question because the standards
of society and the gender binary are so strictly constructed that I doubt there
is room for a five-sex scheme.
Notwithstanding this
earlier argument, society has come a long way when it comes to these issues.
Fausto-Sterling talks about a doctor who was refused an audience some years
back and finally got the audience she requested. This shows that we are
growing, and change is happening, though very small. Activism has played
a significant role in this regard. The relentlessness of people who have suffered and
those who even haven’t has helped shed light on the issue of intersex people.
I particularly like how McCullough puts it in the article. “Finally,
McCullough urges physicians to abandon their practice of treating the birth of
a child with genital ambiguity as a medical or social emergency. Instead, they
should take the time to perform a thorough medical workup and should disclose
everything to the parents, including the uncertainties about the outcome. The
treatment mantra, in other words, should be therapy, not surgery.”
This statement I think is
the best-proffered step in the right direction, if not the solution. Doctors
need to educate themselves in this field in other to help parents make the best
decision possible for their kids. Parents must also do their due diligence
before taking such life-altering decisions for their kids.
There is a thin line between saying we are
opposites or the same is thought-provoking, in the sense that when you analyze
the evidence for each argument, you find an iota of truth in there. It is
therefore confusing that Wade and Ferree point out that some of these views are
wrong. “Seventeenth-century anatomists were wrong, of course”. I see it from the perspective of “we’re cut
from the same cloth”. In the subsequent paragraphs, they talk about a lot of
biological similarities between men and women. “The penis and scrotum do have
something in common with the female anatomy. The same tissue that becomes the
scrotum in males becomes the outer labia in females…This in my opinion points
out that the seventeenth-century anatomist was not entirely wrong after all.
Men and women are different but also similar in many ways. Diversity is beauty, and as humans, we must embrace it all.
References
Fausto-Sterling, Anne.
(2000). The Five Sexes, Revisited.
Wade, Lisa, and Ferree,
Myra Marx. (2019). Ideas. Gender: Ideas, Interactions, and Institutions. (pp
9-36)
That's an interesting article, also, the appearance of the external genitalia is the major determinant of the social sex, which is announced at or shortly after birth. In the absence of normal development of the external genitalia, definitive gender assignment and its announcement have to be postponed. While over the past 20 years the pathogenesis of most disorders causing abnormal development of the genitalia have been elucidated, our knowledge regarding the impact of these defects upon the psychosexual development is rather rudimentary. This information, however, is needed not only to establish criteria for correct sex assignment but also to design relevant outcome studies. Culture is an important part of the context in which decisions are made on sex assignment of patients with abnormalities of the external genitalia. Cultural differences in dealing with intersexuality and intersex individuals not only influences the patient's own psychosexual development but also medical decisions regarding sex assignment and consecutive management. There is evidence that attitudes concerning gender and sexuality, including the acceptance of intersexuality, differ significantly between various cultures. Thus, cross-cultural studies might allow a new approach in dealing with intersexed persons, their families, and their social background, a most important aspect considering the recent discussions and criticisms of patients and individuals affected with intersex disorders.
ReplyDeleteThis is an interesting article, and I enjoyed the analysis presented from the initial picture and the little girls description. Thinking about how this relates to Sonia Correa and Susie Jolly's piece on 'Development's encounter with sexuality'. It seems that what we are looking at also reveals how the sex hierarchies intersect with ethnicity, race, age and as Ahmed mentions culture. Recent studies and 'treatment' approaches denote a type of constructivist approach to sexuality, one in which there is a recognition of great variations of sexualities beyond an easy supposition that the same fixed set of sexual identities are reproduced in everyday context.
ReplyDeleteIn this sense, I would even propose a third option for intersex individuals that could mean they could try to create new identities based on their own unique genital or biological features which do not necessarily have to be tied to a direct comparison to the dichotomy of male and female. Thinking about this possibility makes me wonder if even the more acceptable approach of 'treating' these types of cases would even be necessary as these new categories would stop being understood as abnormalities within the male to female spectrum. Could it be possible that intersex individuals don't need to decide about which category they seem to fit in best and just create a completely separate and new one?
This is a great topic. If you're interested in reading a more recent article by Fausto-Sterling, here is a link: http://www2.kobe-u.ac.jp/~alexroni/IPD%202016%20readings/IPD%202016_3/FAUSTO_STERLING-2000-The_Sciences%205%20sexes%20revisited.pdf
ReplyDeleteThank you Dr. Whitson.
Delete