I agree with Abu-Lughod’s assertion
to be weary of Westerners who claim to be saving or liberating Muslim women. Many
people from the U.S. (who are not Muslim) are eager to discuss the oppression
of Muslim women but have a difficult time recognizing and confronting
patriarchy their own culture. I saw some of this with my students a few weeks
ago after we watched a PBS documentary called Muslims. The documentary discussed the variety of Muslim
experiences and cultures around the world, and explained the hesitance that
some Muslims feel about the spread of dominant Western culture. During the time
I watched this film with my class, we were talking about culture and the deep
ways that culture impacts our views of reality. Even though the video depicted
a wide variety of Muslim men (including Muslim men who clearly respect women),
many of my students still wrote about how Muslims “treat women terribly.” The
video explained that Muslims do not have to wear burqas/hijabs (depending on
the country they live in), and that many of the women who do wear them feel
proud of it. However, I still had many students write about how women are
“forced to cover their faces.” There were moments after teaching that class
where I felt frustrated—“were they not paying attention?” Or “It is so much
more complicated than that.”
Many of my students’ embodied Abu-Lughod’s
assertion that the veil or burqa is strongly connected to contemporary opinions
and concerns for Muslim women. This notion of individual expression and
liberation through clothing is very central to many (especially young) people
in the United States. Dress is talked about as an almost sacred form of
self-expression. However, it is rarely recognized the ways that U.S. culture
(the fashion industry, pop culture, media, gender norms) also limits these
clothing choices.
I think Abu-Lughod’s discussion of
freedom was very interesting. I agree that we are all constrained by the cultural
influences and resources that are around us. Therefore any discussion of
freedom must be contextualized through social-historical histories. Freedom to or from what? Notions of freedom are fluid and change over time. However, I think
many people from the U.S. hold assumptions that they almost own the definition of freedom, not to mention the dominant discourse that they are more civilized than other cultures. These implicit beliefs that the U.S. is
“more evolved” or is “better” came through in my student’s responses to the Muslims video, even if this is not what
they said outright (as seen in some of their comments above). However, I also saw some students perspectives widen
through watching this video. One student noted how out of place a Victoria’s
Secret billboard looked in city with many conservative Muslims, and that this
visual helped her understand how people feel dominated by the spread of Western
culture. Another student, who had stood up on the first day of class and
identified as a “big Republican” wrote about how he was so young when 9/11
happened, that he did not know about the hate crimes that occurred against
Muslim-Americans. He mentioned how sad and disheartened this made him feel. Many students were shocked to see female Muslims who were doctors, PhD students, and
activists.
I echo and appreciate Abu-Lughod’s
question near the end of the article that encouraged us to ask, “how we might
contribute to making the world a more just place” (p. 789). However, people
will still encounter conflict and disagreement, as individuals have different
understandings of what constitutes justice. Maybe Abu-Lughod’s “spirit of
support” is one way to bridge these differences. I like the way that sounds—but
I am interested in what it might look like. Across cultural and spatial
divides, what are good ways to communicate and enact this “spirit of support?”
One way I attempted to do that was through teaching and through promoting the
validity of different perspectives. I am curious about how else people attempt
to do this in their lives, friendships, research, or professions?
Below you can find the video we watched in my class:
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSonia, you bring up some really interesting points in this post, especially about dress and clothing, and I couldn’t help but think (again!) about this piece of a chapter from Sally Engle Merry’s book, Human Rights and Gender Violence (2006), which I posted about earlier today. Merry talks about the report on cultural practices in the family that are violent to women that special rapporteur Radhika Coomaraswamy presented to the UN in 2002. Some of the topics/practices the report describes actually included “veiling” and “images of beauty that emphasize thinness, a widespread problem in the West” (Merry, 2006, p. 62). I found this really interesting, and I appreciate that both you and Coomaraswamy (Merry, 2006) draw attention to the fact that Western, US culture also limits women’s self-expression and clothing choices, and even body shape and weight. The example you give of one student’s observation that a Victoria’s Secret billboard looked “out of place in a city with many conservative Muslims”, really does show how dominant these Western ideas of women’s sexuality are, even dominating in other countries.
ReplyDeleteI also like your question, what does a “spirit of support” look like? I think it looks like the work you are doing through teaching and “promoting the validity of different perspectives”. I think it also looks like Katy’s doctor’s effort to take sexuality and gender identity out of questions about biology and sex (see Katy's post on Sexuality as a Right from 9/23/15). I think it could also look like all of the work we do in class to understand our own relationship to global injustice, and continuing to talk about ways to be inclusive of difference while striving for non-violence.
Sonia, I really enjoyed reading about the reactions/thoughts that your students had to the documentary film, Muslims. It caught my attention that they continued to have negative opinions about Muslim men, despite the fact that the documentary examines a range of expressions of masculinity among Muslims; including, as you mention, those who "care for and respect women" (i.e. in a Western/liberal sense). Likewise the students kept systematically associating the veil or burqa to women's oppression without considering the fact that for many Muslim women the veil is a powerful symbol of pride, social mobility, and tradition. In my opinion, your students' reactions clearly illustrate how profoundly such stereotypes are embedded in the discourse of the West/Global North, and the rigidity that they impose on how “the other” is to be perceived.
ReplyDeleteSince 9/11 we have witnessed the rise of fear toward the Muslim world, particularly as Muslim men are portrayed as potential “terrorists” and perpetual "enemies" of "freedom" and “democracy." Muslim women have likewise been stigmatized as weak, submissive and acquiescent in the face of "evil," and as passive victims in need of being “saved.” As Abu-Ludogh argues, “it’s deeply problematic to construct the Afghan woman as someone in need of saving” (p. 788). In this regard, depictions of Muslim women as a group who are categorically victimized need to be problematized. Such representations have tremendous repercussions in the way that we perceive “the other,” how we construct our dominant social categories, and how we are to understand the role and significance of cultural diversity for contemporary democracy.
I wish to share the CNN report: “Does Islam promote violence?” because I believe it fits well with what we’ve been discussing in class and with your post. In the video, the Iranian-American writer Reza Aslan responds to comedian Bill Maher's generalizations regarding Muslim countries, and discusses the role and the rights of women in the Islamic world: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bwdhib-bZ-s