This week’s reading on the various
chapters of the book Engendering Development brought a lot of things
into perspective for me. In the various sections read, we see how development
and humanitarianism entrenches the already existing gap between the global
north and the global south and consequently widening the inequalities that exist.
Evidently, this occurs because of the form development takes which is being
rooted in imperialist, colonialist and capitalist orientations. Development in
this sense is about economic growth, industrialization, and free trade among
others. As established in the book this form of development is a form of
neocolonialism designed to enroll governments, natural resources and labor into
the circuits of capital so that the very wealthy may continue to benefit from
accumulation by dispossession (Trauger & Fluri, 2019). It is also coupled
with poverty and inequality.
Essential to this form of
development which I want to emphasize is the giving of micro-finance and
micro-credit which comes in the form of small loans to people, mostly to women
in deprived communities in an effort to provide them access to credit and by
extension improving their lives and livelihood. Using Ghana as an example, the
past decade has witnessed a massive growth in the establishment of micro-credit
firms and microfinance in almost all the 16 regions in the country. Mostly,
this credit is to support existing small-scale businesses. It is important to
establish that even though these credits given are for a good course, majority
of them come with conditionalities, high interest rates and short time
schedules for payments. Most people are
not able to satisfy these conditions, and this results in them facing harsh
treatments from lenders. Many people have fled their homes, and some have
committed suicide because of their inability to defray their debts. Another
strategy used by microfinance/credit agencies is also about savings. They
encourage people to save with their agencies with the aim of gaining loans to
expand their businesses in future. In Ghana, this is known as “Susu” and there
are lot of people both men and women who are engaged in this venture. Most
often, the loosing side in this venture is the many poor who have given up
their resources with the hope for the future. A lot of microfinance/credit
institutions have eloped with the monies of their clients in the name of
investment while others have for a very long time now refused to give their
customers their what is rightfully due them. Thus, the monies of the
impoverished many become concentrated in the hands of wealthy few and the consequences
of this is grave inequalities and poverty. Many people in Ghana today protest
the streets of Ghana charging the government to come to their aid. The very intervention that was meant to
improve their lives have rendered them impoverished; many with their businesses
collapsed and others in huge financial debts. Evidently, microfinance/credits
work within capitalist frameworks while attending to or assisting poor
individuals by providing access to credit and fair wages.
Customers of some microfinance companies in Ghana protest the streets of Accra over their locked up money.
No comments:
Post a Comment