Thursday, October 27, 2022

HOW DO WE BRIDGE THE GENDER WAGE GAP; A CASE STUDY OF WAGE DISPARITE IN SOCCER

 Over the last decade, anti-poverty efforts in developing countries have shifted to a greater

emphasis on gender-based approaches, including attaining equality and inclusion through

gender-oriented program innovation. Even though much improvement has been made in

recent years, men continue to outnumber women in paid employment in almost every

developing country, with women working in more informal and precarious economic

positions than men. The readings from “Reassessing Paid Work and Women’s

Empowerment; Lessons from the Global Economy’’: the author spoked about how feminists

emphasized the importance of women’s paid employment. The author also highlighted on

how feminist tradition discussed women’s conditions of services in the job field especially

issues or concerns relating to “equal pay, opportunities for promotion training and

progression through the hierarchy, flexible hours and leave, protection of reproduction health,

freedom from harassment, appropriate non- wage benefit be recognized by both trade unions

and management’’(Pearson, Ruth. 2007).

The issue of unequal pay or pay discrimination, especially against women, is common in

soccer. This made me think about the lawsuit the U.S. women's national soccer team filed

against the U.S. Soccer Federation over pay discrimination. It is sad to know how equal work

results in unequal compensation. For instance, when the U.S. men's national team loses in a

friendly match, each player is paid $5000, while the women's team receives nothing for even

a draw. Similarly, when the men's team wins, they receive as much as $17,625, while the

women receive only $ 1,350.

Meanwhile, the women's team brings more glory in a competitive tournament for the nation

than the men. In 2011, when the women's team placed second in their world cup tournament,

they were awarded $1.8 million, which was shared equally among the 24 players, while the

men's team, who made it to the round of 16 of the 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa,

were awarded $5 million. In addition to this happening at the federation level, FIFA, which

oversees soccer, does not pay women the same as men. A classic example is Germany's men's

team, which won the 2014 World Cup. The team was awarded $35 million by FIFA, while

the women received only 5% of that for their women's world cup victory in 2015.

                             Source: Time

The controversy surrounding equal pay in soccer also illuminates various conceptions of fairness. Men's matches produce significantly more revenue than women's matches, which are frequently in the red. During a men's tournament, retailers are more likely to increase garden furniture sales, Barbeque accessories, and sunscreen. Men soccer players endure intense competition and must work harder to reach the top. The massive publicity also results in increased pressure. Some claim that the men's game is simply more appealing; they run quicker and are more potent than women, making their matches more intense.

Does this justify the huge salary discrepancy between male and female footballers, particularly on the national team?

How do we bridge that gap to ensure equity and fairness?

 


No comments:

Post a Comment