I have always been intrigued by the trend
in job opportunities for women in India. Growing up, some of the opportunities
promoted by family would be medical and education fields. Times have changed,
and now women are exploring newer fields like engineering and information and
communication technology. However, the labour reports show trends that are
devasting in terms of the participation of women in the Indian workforce.
The Oxfam
India's Discrimination Report 2022 blames "societal and employers'
prejudices" for women's lower wages, and non-participation in economic activity.
Pearson argued in her article Reassessing Paid Work and Women’s empowerment:
Lesson’s from the Global Economy that just the evidence of income cannot be
related to the idea of “empowerment” of women.
As a working woman
myself, I have faced discrimination in workplace at various levels. I can
recall an instance, where I was told “leave from work is not a right but privilege”.
Which essentially means that your work contract may have assigned casual
leaves, but it is not necessary that you receive those leaves. Fonderson’s idea
of “regulation” and the normalization of power works effectively in the Indian
context of female workforce.
The marginalization of
female workforce does not happen only at the employer’s level, but also at the
societal level. The Oxfam Labor Report 2022 states "The inequality for
women and other social categories is not just due to poor access to education
or work experience but because of discrimination.". The Indian society
has struggled with caste bias for ages, and the 2022 report shows that the bias
still exists, despite of multiple policy changes at the government level.
According to the report, the Dalit (lower caste) and Muslim (minority) women
are the most marginalized groups. The report looked at government data on jobs,
wages, health and access to agricultural credit among various social groups
from 2004 to 2020 and used statistical models to quantify discrimination. They found that on an average men earned 4,000
rupees ($50; £44) more than women, non-Muslims earned 7,000 rupees more than
Muslims and those at the dalit and tribespeople made 5,000 rupees less compared
to others.
The wage gap oppresses
women dually, one based on gender and the other based on their identity as a
dalit or a Muslim woman. The other area which affects the regression in female work force, is female infanticide. Thousands
of female foetuses are aborted annually in India, due to the societal belief that
women are not a source of economic benefit to the family. Women are considered
a liability, due to the dowry system that makes the family of women pay large
sum of money to the man’s family. Due to the oppressive structures of Indian
society, women are largely cut off from being part of this thriving country,
either through female infanticide or through discrimination.
The need of the hour then is to not only focus on the inclusion of women within the workforce, but to create campaigns like Beti Bachao Beti Padhao ( Save a Girl, Educate a Girl) to function in tandem with economic structural changes and policies that aim at inclusion of women in the workforce. These campaigns are not effective in the current times as they are clouded by political agenda and are implemented in isolation.
ReferencesLairap-Fonderson, J. (2003). The disciplinary power of micro credit: Examples from Kenya and Cameroon.
Pearson, R. (2007). 16 Reassessing paid work and women's empowerment: lessons from the global. Feminisms in development: Contradictions, contestations and challenges, 201.
BDNews24, (2022). Women's participation in Indian workforce low due to gender discrimination: Oxfam
Hi Anisha!
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your post. And I loved how you connected the dots of abortion with female labor in India. During this semester, and especially when we read playing with fire, I started being aware of the caste system in India and acknowledging the implications this hierarchy system has on people's lives, especially in women's lives. I once read in a news blog that gender revelation parties are prohibited from reducing female fetus abortion rates. From your experience and context, is this true?
Indeed, this is a sensitive topic for me because being pro-abortion is being pro-human rights. For instance, in Ecuador, feminist and pro-abortion movements have increased their scope in the last few years, which made it at the end of last year that the national congress approved a legislation draft to make abortion legal in cases of rape. This draft was mainly drawn and argued based on the fact that Ecuador is one of the countries in Latin America with the highest rates of teenage pregnancy. In the end, the Ecuadorian president vetoed this legislation draft which caused mobilization, especially among feminist groups that are still advocating for "aborto legal, libre y Seguro" (safe, legal, and free abortion). However, when I think in this context where abortion is practiced based solely on the fetus's sex is kind of contradictory with human and women's rights. This made me realize how different policies can be weaponized to meet political interests that keep reinforcing women's marginalization and reproduce class and gender segregation.
Thank you for writing about this.