Microfinance is not a new idea.
Small-scale micro-credit services have been offered since the 1700s but in
Egypt it was not till the 1950s that agricultural micro-lending was made
accessible through the government-owned bank, Principal Bank for Development
and Agriculture (PBDAC). Since then, several other projects have been created
such as the Productive Families project (PF), which was introduced by the
Ministry of Social Affairs in 1977 to offer microcredit to low-income groups,
conditional on having a government worker guarantor.
In 1982, the United Nations
Children’s Fund (UNICEF) initiated a program for rural women with an emphasis
on female-headed households. The program was implemented by the Ministry of
Social Affairs while the Ford Foundation sponsored the Association for Garbage
Collectors in Cairo in 1983 to offer credit and employment-related education
(Barsoum, 2011). The project now manages under the sponsorships of the Ministry
of Rural Development. The area of microfinance in Egypt significantly shifted
in the late 1980s. In 1988 a project by the United States Agency for
International Development (USAID) in Egypt geared such changes (USAID, 2013).
USAID funds were earmarked for the development of the small and
micro-enterprise sector. The fund was focused on seed capital, organized
development financing, education, and technical aid, and do research (USAID
2013).
USAID created two examples for the
distribution of credit in Egypt: the foundation model and the bank model. The
foundation model was to create not-for-profit foundations to provide an
intermediary among individual debtors and the providing banks where seed funds
were placed as a guarantee of a credit line for these debtors (USAID, 2013).
Two institutions were first founded: the Small Enterprise Development
Foundation (Cairo Foundation, which offers credit in the Cairo governorate) and
the Alexandria Small Business Organization (ABO). The model was later
reproduced in five other governorates: Port Said (1995), Assuit (1996),
Sharkyla (1997), Dakahleya (1998), and Kafr El-Sheikh (1999). The bank model
was applied by the National Bank for Development with staff in 13 of its
offices devoted to the establishment of small and micro-business lending and
mobile companies spreading out of each branch (USAID 2013).
While increasing the field
considerably, the USAID role introduced a new flow in the microfinance area in
Egypt that recognized it from the earlier practices. It emphasized the business
development model vis-a-vis the previous poverty mitigation model. Various
approaches and targeting processes developed. The new focus group was small
firms in urban places instead of the previous emphasis on rural home-based
events.
The business of the new project was
mostly male despite the donors’ emphasis on a female presence. Loan amounts
were comparatively large. More emphasis was positioned on program
self-sufficiency, sustainability, and even effectiveness (USAID, 2013) as
opposed to the previous dependence on donor funds. In their targeting policies,
programs emphasized the economic capacity of the borrower rather than their
poverty. Expansion officers were primarily male, and a strict bonus and salary
system was applied in order to tie the reimbursement rate of the borrowers to
the salary of the extension officer who chose them and was accountable for the
collection of their loan payments. This wage system formed a crucial structure
that ensured that only thriving enterprises received credit and that unstable
or low-income economic activities were filtered out.
Hello Ahmed,
ReplyDeleteYou have given some insight into the provision of Micro-fianancial services in Egypt and they were very educative. Microfinance is one way of assisting women in breaking the cycle of poverty and also empowering them to manage their finances. Do you have institutions that ensure those loans are being effectively used?
Hi Ahmed,
ReplyDeleteInteresting submissions! This relates to similar scenarios in Nigeria where the microcredit business development model is seen as an anti-poverty strategy. Although, proof of economic capacity is mostly required for large loans through commercial banks in Nigeria, however, for microcredit women are still required to provide guarantors that offer some form of collateral or have an economic value/capacity which indirectly connects to the existing financial institution framework of proof of economic capacity.
I find a mix of both grants and small loans in some development and empowerment programming by some large NGOs for rural women in Nigeria. But there are contemporary changes to micro-financial operations considering the rapid shift to the virtual world after the covid-19 pandemic. One glaring challenge that remains is the lack of technical skills and the digital divide in rural locations to navigate the financial terrains in the 21st century.